When:
Wednesday, November 9, 2022
1:45 PM - 2:45 PM CT
Where: Simpson Querrey Biomedical Research Center, Simpson Querrey Auditorium, 303 E. Superior Street, Chicago, IL 60611 map it
Audience: Faculty/Staff - Student - Post Docs/Docs - Graduate Students
Contact:
Beverly A Kirk
(312) 503-5217
Group: Simpson Querrey Institute for Epigenetics Lecture Series
Category: Lectures & Meetings
The Simpson Querrey Institute for Epigenetics presents:
Andrea Musacchio, PhD
Director, Department of Mechanistic Cell Biology
Max Planck Institute of Molecular Physiology
Dortmund, Germany
"Chromosome Segregation: From Molecules to Systems"
Chromosome bi-orientation is required for successful cell division, but how it is achieved in settings as diverse as mitosis and meiosis remains poorly understood. Kinetochores are crucial for chromosome bi-orientation and impart fidelity to the chromosome segregation process. In addition to binding microtubules, they recognize and correct improper microtubule attachments, and act as control centers to make the timing of cell division contingent on completion of bi-orientation through the spindle assembly checkpoint. How are these different activities regulated and integrated within the kinetochore’s structure? To answer this question, our laboratory took up the long-term goal of reconstituting kinetochores and their functions in vitro, focusing on human kinetochores as model system. The reconstitution is challenging, because kinetochores consist collectively of ~35 core subunits [1], and several additional regulatory subunits, for a total of ~100 different polypeptides. The challenge is compounded by the embedding of kinetochores in the complex and incompletely understood environment of the centromere, a specialized chromatin domain whose organization promotes epigenetic propagation of the kinetochore assembly site through cell generations. As a summary, I will present three large reconstitutions, comprising two major stable kinetochore sub-complexes (each with molecular mass ³ 1 MDa), and the signaling ensemble of the spindle assembly checkpoint [1-3]. I will illustrate organizational principles that have emerged from this work. All three reconstitutions reflect stable interactions at thermodynamic equilibrium, and therefore are not “alive”. The ultimate challenge for future in vitro work on the kinetochore, and a more general challenge for any in vitro reconstitution, is to ignite the energy-dissipating reactions that promote functional regulation and informational processing. We would like to build particles that, like their cellular counterparts, sense bi-orientation (or lack thereof) and turn the checkpoint on or off depending on context. This will require the addition of enzymes, most notably mitotic kinases and phosphatases, whose opposing regulation determines, at any given time, appropriate context-dependent signaling outcomes.
Selected recent references
[1] Walstein K, Petrovic A, Pan D, Hagemeier B, Vogt D, Vetter IR & Musacchio A (2021) Assembly principles and stoichiometry of a complete human kinetochore module Sci Adv. 7:eabg1037.
[2] Piano V, Alex A, Stege P, Maffini S, Stoppiello GA, Huis In 't Veld PJ, Vetter IR & Musacchio A (2021) CDC20 assists its catalytic incorporation in the mitotic checkpoint complex. Science 371:67-71.
[3] Singh P, Pesenti ME, Maffini S, Carmignani S, Hedtfeld M, Petrovic A, Srinivasamani A, Bange T & Musacchio A (2021) BUB1 and CENP-U, primed by CDK1, are the main PLK1 kinetochore receptors in mitosis, Mol Cell. 81:67-87.
[4] Pesenti M, Raisch T, Conti D, Walstein K, Hofmann I, Vogt D, Pumbaum D, Vetter IR, Raunser S & Musacchio A (2022) Structure of the human inner kinetochore CCAN complex and its significance for human centromere organization, Mol Cell 82:2113-2131.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2022.04.027
[5] Raisch T, Ciossani G, d'Amico E, Cmentowski V, Carmignani S, Maffini S, Merino F, Wohlgemuth S, Vetter IR, Raunser S & Musacchio A (2022) Structure of the RZZ complex and molecular basis of Spindly-driven corona assembly at human kinetochores, EMBO J 41:e110411. doi: 10.15252/embj.2021110411