BEGIN:VCALENDAR
PRODID:-//planitpurple.northwestern.edu//iCalendar Event//EN
VERSION:2.0
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
CLASS:PUBLIC
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:America/Chicago
TZURL:http://tzurl.org/zoneinfo-outlook/America/Chicago
X-LIC-LOCATION:America/Chicago
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0600
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:CDT
DTSTART:19700308T020000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYMONTH=3;BYDAY=2SU
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0600
TZNAME:CST
DTSTART:19701101T020000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYMONTH=11;BYDAY=1SU
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
SEQUENCE:0
DTSTART;TZID=America/Chicago:20260504T133000
DTEND;TZID=America/Chicago:20260504T153000
DTSTAMP:20260426T084939Z
SUMMARY:Chaofeng Wu CS PhD Final Defense: Computational Methods in Economics
UID:641951@northwestern.edu
TZID:America/Chicago
DESCRIPTION:This dissertation develops and applies computational methods to three problems at the frontier of empirical economics\, united by a common objective: to operationalize abstract economic concepts using modern machine learning tools\, to uncover new empirical knowledge through those measurements\, and to evaluate the conditions under which such tools can be trusted.     The first essay asks what makes a scientific paper novel\, and whether novelty of different kinds matters differently for impact. Treating novelty as a multidimensional construct rather than a single attribute\, the essay leverages Large Language Models (LLMs) and embedding models to measure novelty directly from the full text of scientific papers. It finds that specific dimensions of novelty\, defined by a paper's distinctiveness from its intellectual neighbors versus its engagement with the current frontier\, predict fundamentally different outcomes. This finding reveals a strategic tension in knowledge production that citation-based measures of impact cannot capture. The second essay asks why strategic behavior systematically departs from game-theoretic predictions in complex environments. Drawing on a massive dataset of hundreds of millions of chess games\, it develops an interpretable measure of when a position is genuinely difficult for a boundedly rational agent\, and uncovers a new stylized fact: complexity arises endogenously more often among higher-skilled players. A structural model reveals that this pattern reflects experts' ability to sustain complexity\, rather than a preference for risk\, a finding with broader implications for understanding how people create and exploit strategic complexity. The third essay asks how much we should trust a predictive model when it is applied outside the context in which it was estimated. It formalizes this out-of-domain prediction problem\, derives coverage-guaranteed forecast intervals for transfer error\, and finds suggestive evidence that the in-domain superiority of black-box algorithms does not reliably generalize across domains\, a cautionary note with direct relevance for the use of machine learning in situations requiring generalizability.     Together\, these essays argue that the value of computational tools in economics lies not only in their raw predictive power\, but more importantly in their capacity\, when disciplined by economic theory\, to render previously unobservable quantities measurable and to rigorously evaluate the limits of predictive models.
LOCATION:Mudd Hall ( formerly Seeley G. Mudd Library)\, Mudd 3514\, 2233 Tech Drive\, Evanston\, IL 60208
TRANSP:OPAQUE
URL:https://planitpurple.northwestern.edu/event/641951
CREATED:20260424T050000Z
STATUS:CONFIRMED
LAST-MODIFIED:20260424T050000Z
PRIORITY:0
BEGIN:VALARM
TRIGGER:-PT10M
ACTION:DISPLAY
DESCRIPTION:Reminder
END:VALARM
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR