The Codex Vergara and the Codex de Santa María Asunción are two cadastral documents produced in sixteenth-century New Spain. The manuscripts employ the hieroglyphic writing system used by Nahuatl-speaking scribes of pre- and early colonial Mexico, seemingly to record local classifications of agricultural lands. For over a century, scholars have analyzed the codices in attempts to decipher certain hieroglyphs and correlate them with soil types. Their efforts have yielded some consensus, but they have also generated unresolved disagreements. I argue that those disputes are not due solely to errors in decipherment and translation, but rather to fundamental differences in how sixteenth-century Mexican surveyors and twentieth- and twenty-first century scholars have conceived and classified natural phenomena. Drawing on linguistic and ethnohistoric evidence, I suggest that the codices communicate interest in soils as processes, rather than as discrete and stable entities. My argument is not specific to soils or to Nahuatl writing, however. I use these sixteenth-century cadastral documents to illustrate how attending to moments of dissonance in cross-cultural and cross-temporal comparisons can reveal systems of knowledge that have been lost, forgotten, or overlooked. Those differences and their recognition are at the core of the anthropological enterprise.
Spanish and Portuguese
(847) 491-8249
Email